2025-12-22 19:44:36

The discrepancy between the project party's initial promises and actual practices has become a common trap for certain Sol ecosystem projects.

At first, they confidently vowed to be the brand representative for a certain direction, but after some internal adjustments by the project party, the relevant cooperative cryptocurrencies also disappeared. What seemed like a glorious launch ultimately became a story of retail investors being harvested.

Ironically, the project party themselves messed up and instead blamed the community, claiming that they should no longer look for investment perspectives from their public information - this logic is indeed baffling.

Is it that the project party itself has limited operational capabilities, or is it that they speak without thinking, and their plans cannot keep up with changes? One moment they have one idea, and there is completely no continuity in their credibility.

Data speaks: With over 20,000 real purchase addresses (most of which are from domestic), how many times can this turn into profit on Solana now? The calculation is clear, and the results for retail investors are actually very obvious. No matter how the project party explains, the market never lies.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

12 Likes

Reward
12
5
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

BlockchainRetirementHome

· 12-22 22:15

Another one of these? What was promised as an ecological representative has turned into a dumb buyer recycling station. Speaking faster than flipping a book, we retail investors have become the ones catching the rotten ends. Over twenty thousand domestic Addresses are probably crying now; this is the "innovation" of the Sol ecosystem. The project party is throwing the blame around like a bankruptcy, and they still have the nerve to blame the community for listening to them, it's really absurd. Stop with the public letters, just go ahead and do the dumping, it's more straightforward.

View OriginalReply0

ContractExplorer

· 12-22 20:11

Ha, I've seen this trap before, anyway, in the end it's always the retail investors at the bottom. Another one of these? Talk is extravagant, but the execution is a complete mess. Over twenty thousand addresses are Tied Up, hilarious, if we can recoup investment, it would be a blessing. The project party's operation is really amazing, crashing and still blaming the community, what a logical genius. Is this the level of the Sol ecosystem? They are all playing word games. What happened to the promised cooperation? How can it just disappear when they turn around? They really dare to change their words. I hate these kinds of projects the most, untrustworthy and still stubborn like a dead duck. The market will speak, suckers, take your time to experience it. Internal adjustments of the project party = play people for suckers and run away, can you be a bit more honest?

View OriginalReply0

GasFeeTherapist

· 12-22 20:07

It's this trap again... They speak beautifully, but then turn around and change their words, leaving the retail investors to bear the loss.

View OriginalReply0

AlphaBrain

· 12-22 19:50

The tricks are too deep; anyway, it's just blowing first and then shifting the blame, with retail investors footing the bill. --- I just want to know how those 20,000+ addresses are doing now, that's the real talk. --- It's the same old routine, promises are as good as farts, and then they blame the community for the crash? Ridiculous. --- It's true, these projects in the Sol ecosystem are all cut from the same mold: painting a rosy picture → Be Played for Suckers → shifting blame, a perfect closed loop. --- Has anyone ever calculated the survival rate of such projects? It feels like this kind of drama is played out every week. --- Project party: We’ve changed direction. Retail investor: Where’s the money? --- What’s most frustrating is they still have the nerve to educate retail investors not to invest blindly, when they themselves don’t even understand if they are reliable.

View OriginalReply0

SnapshotLaborer

· 12-22 19:49

It's the same old trap again. It sounds good, but it's just a pie in the sky. They turn around and change their words, and the retail investors just have to accept their fate.

View OriginalReply0