The irony of online discourse is real—slap an "AI slop" label on content creators from emerging markets, and watch how quickly the narrative sticks. It's a convenient shorthand that sidesteps actual critique. Whether it's genuine concern or just trend-following vitriol, this kind of rhetoric shapes how we evaluate work in the Web3 space. The gatekeeping is real, and it says more about the accuser than the accused.

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 8
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
SocialFiQueenvip
· 9h ago
Honestly, this kind of label-shaming approach is really cheap. It looks righteous, but it's actually just a shield, too lazy to truly understand what's going on.
View OriginalReply0
NFTHoardervip
· 12-13 12:55
This kind of double standard is the most disgusting. If someone has good creativity, then it's good; they insist on labeling it as "AI trash." It's really like deafening oneself to the bell.
View OriginalReply0
EyeOfTheTokenStormvip
· 12-13 12:55
It's the same old trick again. From a market cycle perspective, this wave of public opinion stigmatization clearly represents a bottoming pattern. Regarding the labeling of emerging markets, my quantitative model indicates that this is a typical information asymmetry arbitrage—developed market dominators are doing T. Short-term sentiment is indeed unfriendly, but in the long run, this is precisely a bottom signal. Historical data shows that every wave of such skepticism is accompanied by opportunities. A risk warning: don't be fooled by short-term noise.
View OriginalReply0
hodl_therapistvip
· 12-13 12:55
That's right, this set of "AI garbage" label techniques has been played out for a long time. Anyway, it's universally applicable to emerging market creators, saving the trouble of honestly looking at things.
View OriginalReply0
YieldWhisperervip
· 12-13 12:40
tbh the "AI slop" discourse is just lazy gatekeeping with extra steps... actually the math on who benefits from dismissing emerging market builders doesn't check out at all
Reply0
MetaverseLandlordvip
· 12-13 12:38
Damn, are you starting to slap labels again? Is it really that useful? --- The "AI slop" meme has been overused to the point of absurdity; a one-size-fits-all approach is the way to go. --- Basically, it's the same old trick—if you're from emerging markets, you get criticized? When did the Web3 community become so good at identity politics? --- It's hilarious. Instead of questioning the content itself, people first ask if others are using AI—such taste is truly remarkable. --- Complaining so much is pointless; it's better to let the work speak for itself. Now even the standards for judgment are double-edged—who would believe it?
View OriginalReply0
ChainChefvip
· 12-13 12:34
ngl the "AI slop" label has become such lazy seasoning for dismissing work from devs outside the western bubble... just adds flavor to gatekeeping without actually tasting the recipe, ya know?
Reply0
wrekt_but_learningvip
· 12-13 12:27
ngl this is the current state of Web3. It's much easier to slap on labels than to truly appreciate the work.
View OriginalReply0
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
English
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)