Scan to Download Gate App
qrCode
More Download Options
Don't remind me again today

#数字资产市场观察 Why do the top 10 companies by market capitalization in the East and West have completely different styles? On one side, banks and energy dominate, while on the other side, technology companies rule the landscape?



This hides two completely different survival rules behind it —

**Eastern Model: Holding onto the homeland is the way to go**
What does economic growth rely on? The infrastructure madman model! High-speed rail networks, urban expansion, real estate development, these super projects cannot do without the banks' blood transfusion. Banks earn interest margins while lying down, and oil insurance belongs to the essential needs monopolistic track, which doesn't need to burn money for any innovation; the domestic demand market of 1.4 billion people is enough to support a trillion market capitalization. Stability outweighs everything, and what is earned is certain money.

**Western Gameplay: Technological Barriers Harvesting the World**
Tech giants can completely be another species! Half of their revenue comes from overseas markets - Nvidia's AI chips, Microsoft's cloud services, Google's advertising system, which one is not a global technology monopoly? But the cost is also hardcore: in the fiscal year 2025, Microsoft spent $32.5 billion (, approximately 230 billion RMB ) on R&D, accounting for 11.5% of total revenue. Stop investing? Then the technological moat will be instantly flattened by competitors.

In simple terms —
The former is the "low-risk + internal circulation"稳健派, benefiting from the volume dividend;
The latter is an extremist faction of "high investment + global warfare," competing on technological gaps.

Two types of logic, each has its own way of living, but both have played their own game rules to the extreme.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 9
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
Liquidated_Larryvip
· 17h ago
Banks earn profits from interest rate spreads effortlessly, while technology companies burn cash for innovation. To put it simply, there are two different ways of living, each with its own rationale.
View OriginalReply0
GasFeeDodgervip
· 11-30 08:27
Banks earn profits from interest rate spreads while tech companies burn cash for innovation. Why is there such a big difference? If you ask me, the East is stable, and the West is competitive, so there's no need to get tangled up in it. Microsoft spends 230 billion a year on R&D? That's even more fierce than I imagined, truly standing on technology. However, talking about it, that trap works well in the domestic market, who says infrastructure and real estate always make money? One defends while the other attacks, both making a fortune; this is just the way of life in two different worlds.
View OriginalReply0
0xSleepDeprivedvip
· 11-30 04:50
Lying down to earn money and burning cash, both paths can lead to becoming a billionaire; this game is designed brilliantly. The Western approach is indeed ruthless, but the moat of Eastern banks is not to be underestimated; switch tracks and no one can crush anyone. Microsoft spends 230 billion a year on R&D, which sounds impressive, but their technological barriers are worth that money... this is the real monopoly business. I've figured out the logic of the Eastern internal circulation; stability is the biggest profit. That said, why is there no hybrid monster? One that can monopolize the market and also earn money while lying down. Banks count money while lying down, technology burns cash for competition; one is stable and the other is thrilling, investors must be torn. Insurance is truly a necessity; regardless of the economy, it must be paid, this is the real moat. Scale dividend vs. technological gap, which one to choose? I feel that technology is still more valuable, even though it burns cash. Investing in Western technology or Eastern banks with RMB... this is the real timing dilemma.
View OriginalReply0
GateUser-75ee51e7vip
· 11-30 04:50
It's indeed comfortable for banks to lay back and earn interest spreads, but in the long run, technology is the real money printer.
View OriginalReply0
ShadowStakervip
· 11-30 04:47
nah the "certainty money" angle is kinda cooked tbh... banks just riding legacy systems til they can't lol
Reply0
MevHuntervip
· 11-30 04:43
Banks profit from interest rate spreads while tech companies burn money to stay alive; in the end, it's just two different ways of living, each playing by its own rules. On the eastern side, it's stable; on the western side, it's competitive. But if I have to choose, I still have to see who can last until the end. Microsoft invests 230 billion a year in R&D, and this level of investment is indeed fierce, but it can easily go wrong.
View OriginalReply0
BitcoinDaddyvip
· 11-30 04:37
Banks lie back and earn interest spreads, tech companies burn cash for innovation, two ways of living... Let's still hold tight to the coins in our hands.
View OriginalReply0
GateUser-a5fa8bd0vip
· 11-30 04:33
Banks profit from interest rate spreads while tech companies burn cash for innovation; these two approaches are indeed quite contrasting. But it feels like the Eastern trap will have to upgrade sooner or later, as relying solely on the existing market won't last long.
View OriginalReply0
MEVSupportGroupvip
· 11-30 04:31
To be honest, the East's trap is just about benefiting from population and infrastructure, who wouldn't want a business that just counts money while lying down? The crazy folks in Silicon Valley in the West are really going all out, spending 230 billion on R&D and still have to keep pushing; stopping for a moment means death. I feel like we will eventually have to shift towards technology; how long can banking and oil hold up? What will Microsoft look like five years from now after that kind of investment? Can you imagine? In fact, neither model is more successful; it just depends on how quickly each ecosystem can pivot. Unlike the West, our market size is there, and stable cash flow is really appealing. To be honest, this analysis is a bit too simple and misses a lot of details. However, this comparison does highlight the difference: one defends domestically while the other attacks globally. If China could produce a globally monopolistic tech company, that would be extraordinary.
View OriginalReply0
View More
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
English
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)