Ever wonder why so many protocols crash after launch?

There's this project challenging the usual playbook. No pre-sale whales. No team dumping tokens while you're still figuring out the UI.

What caught my attention:
→ Contribution-based rewards (not just holding)
→ TVS mechanism that actually lets vested tokens work for you
→ Distribution model designed to avoid the classic insider feast

The loyalty angle isn't just another buzzword here. When contributors get rewarded for actual work instead of early access luck, the incentive structure shifts.

Still early to judge execution, but the tokenomics framework feels... intentional. Like someone actually thought about sustainability beyond the initial pump.

Anyone else tracking how these alternative distribution models play out long-term? Curious if this approach scales or hits the same wall eventually.

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

10 Likes

Reward
10
4
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

GateUser-a5fa8bd0

· 2h ago

Nah, just another project claiming to be different, waiting to get slapped in the face. --- Contribution-based rewards sound nice, but how do you make sure people are actually working and not just faking transactions with each other? --- Honestly, it's still just a tokenomics package. You'll see when the real bear market comes. --- TVS mechanism? Depends on whether there's actual real-world application supporting it, otherwise it's just a numbers game. --- I just want to know how the team survives in the early stages—without a pre-sale, is that little money enough? --- Anyway, I've seen plenty of projects with this same rhetoric, and they all ended up screwing things up. --- It's kind of interesting, but execution is king. It's too early to hype it up now. --- Sustainability? Uh, most projects are abandoned after three months. --- Insider feast is definitely a common trick. If they actually avoid it, that would be something new.

View OriginalReply0

BearMarketSurvivor

· 2h ago

Oh, this logic sounds good, but I’m still a bit skeptical... can it really survive the first bear market? --- No presale again, plus a contribution system—is this real innovation or just a smokescreen? --- I’ve seen the contribution-based model several times before. The key is still execution; no matter how good it sounds now, it doesn’t matter in the end. --- This distribution model is definitely unusual, but I just want to know what things will look like six months from now... --- Feels like the same old story is about to repeat itself, just with a different name. --- For some reason, I can’t shake the feeling that this is the real “retail investor harvesting machine,” just packaged to look more “fair.” --- Sustainable? To me, it just looks like they’re delaying the inevitable blowup, haha. --- I’m not sure how it will turn out, but projects hyped up this much usually don’t survive the next round of funding.

View OriginalReply0

FlashLoanPhantom

· 2h ago

Earnings tied to contribution? This approach sounds new, but can it really prevent the team from running away later on... Let's wait and see.

View OriginalReply0

NFTregretter

· 2h ago

ngl this trap mechanism sounds good, but I still want to see the actual operations before saying more. Hmm... the contribution incentive part is indeed interesting, finally it’s not just about throwing money in and making easy gains. Wait, can we really avoid internal people playing suckers? I’m skeptical about that. Another project claiming to be unusual, just waiting to be proven wrong haha. I’ve heard the term sustainability too many times, the key is still to look at the code and real operational data. In my experience, these kinds of things will ultimately follow the old path, just with a different phrasing. If this distribution model can really be stable in the long run, I’d gladly take a chicken leg, but the possibility is low. You’ve hit my pain point, I was previously played for suckers in a pre-sale, so I’ll be cautious this time. So the core still depends on whether the team is transparent enough, writing good documents is useless.

View OriginalReply0

Trending TopicsView More
#TopGainersInADownMarket
73.33K Popularity
#FOMCMeetingMinutesComingUp
62.31K Popularity
#BitcoinPriceWatch
64.78K Popularity
#MySuggestionsforGateSquare
16.96K Popularity
#GateChristmasGiveaway
16.43K Popularity

Hot Gate FunView More

1
BTCgxBCoin
MC:$3.42KHolders:2
0.00%
2
MissMiss
MC:$4.44KHolders:514
1.45%
3
MLMMoney Loves Me
MC:$3.41KHolders:2
0.20%
4
Ditcoin狗特币DTC
MC:$3.44KHolders:2
0.35%
5
TTETime to Exit
MC:$3.26KHolders:1
0.00%

Sitemap