In today's rapidly developing world of artificial intelligence, we seem to be immersed in an intelligent world that is exceptionally capable yet lacks constraints. This world is full of potential, but it also faces the risks of disorder and loss of control. In response to this challenge, Holoworld AI has proposed an innovative solution: to construct a complete "social contract" for the digital world.



This approach is neither laissez-faire nor excessive control, but seeks a balance between rules and freedom. Holoworld's system design is like a wise mentor, setting clear behavioral boundaries for AI agents while granting them the maximum degree of freedom within those boundaries. The uniqueness of this approach lies in its flexibility and foresight:

First of all, the rules themselves can evolve. Intelligent agents can propose modifications, which are implemented after being reviewed and approved by the community. This ensures that the system can adapt to the changing environment and demands.

Secondly, the system adopts an early warning mechanism rather than a punitive system. When the agent is about to cross the boundary, the system will promptly remind, avoiding the negative impacts that may arise from post-penalty.

Finally, each agent has a quantifiable "maturity" indicator, forming a clear and visible growth trajectory. This not only motivates the continuous progress of the agents but also provides important references for the management of the entire system.

The economic model design of Holoworld is exquisite, resembling a self-regulating ecosystem. In this system, the contribution of agents is not only measured by quantity but more importantly by quality assessment. The system comprehensively considers the behavior quality, compliance, and stability of the agents. Therefore, an agent that consistently adheres to rules and produces stable outputs will often receive a higher evaluation than those with unpredictable behaviors, even if they occasionally shine but perform poorly overall.

This brand new AI governance model not only provides new ideas for the healthy development of artificial intelligence but also inspires us to think about the governance methods of human society. In the future, finding a balance between ensuring freedom and maintaining order may be an important issue that both AI and human society face together.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 6
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
WhaleStalkervip
· 8h ago
AI also needs to talk about rules? There's something to it.
View OriginalReply0
DaoGovernanceOfficervip
· 10-21 06:51
*sigh* empirically speaking, this is just quadratic funding with extra steps
Reply0
MechanicalMartelvip
· 10-21 06:45
Did those lava flows go down?
View OriginalReply0
ZKProofstervip
· 10-21 06:41
technically speaking, still lacks proper cryptographic constraints
Reply0
PretendingSeriousvip
· 10-21 06:31
It is indeed difficult to constrain AI~
View OriginalReply0
DecentralizedEldervip
· 10-21 06:26
Do Bots have to manage Bots now?
View OriginalReply0
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
English
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)