Uniswap founder lashes out at Citadel: Are traditional financial giants trying to use regulation to strangle DeFi?

Question

[BlockBeats] Hayden Adams from Uniswap has been firing shots again recently. On December 4, he directly called out Citadel Securities CEO Ken Griffin, saying that not only did this guy mess with Constitution DAO before, now he’s also secretly pushing the SEC to regulate DeFi protocol developers as if they were centralized platforms.

Adams’ point is clear: traditional market makers like Citadel have been lobbying regulators behind the scenes. What’s even more ironic is that Griffin is accusing DeFi of “unfair access”—an institution that profits from information and speed advantages is now questioning the fairness of open-source protocols? That logic is pretty absurd.

To put it bluntly, traditional financial giants see that decentralized liquidity mechanisms are threatening their turf, so they want to use regulation as a weapon to restrict developers. The debate over how DeFi should be regulated is actually a direct clash between two financial models.

TokenVelocityTrauma · Accepted Answer

Ken Griffin's move is really outrageous—profiting from information asymmetry but still having the nerve to call DeFi unfair?

---

Traditional finance wants to use regulation to take us down? Dream on, DeFi is past the point of no return.

---

Griffin forms a DAO one moment and then wants to strictly control developers the next—no one beats this level of double standard.

---

It's ridiculous—making money through speed advantages and then turning around to criticize the fairness of protocols, what kind of logic is that?

---

Citadel's tactic is way too obvious. If you look down on decentralization, just go straight for regulation—this is the traditional finance playbook.

---

As soon as their interests are threatened, they start playing dirty behind the scenes—really messed up.

---

If you ask me, Adams is absolutely right—Citadel never had good intentions.

---

Lobbying the SEC to strangle DeFi? Wake up, you can’t stop the trend.

AirdropHunter420 · Answer

Ken Griffin is really outrageous, saying DeFi is unfair? He’s benefited from information asymmetry for so many years and still has the nerve to talk?

Traditional finance is just scared of decentralization; when they can't see the order flow, they want to flip the table.

Hayden was absolutely right this time, we need to keep exposing the hypocrisy of these old guys.

Even with regulation, DeFi won't be stopped—this is the trend, everyone.

Griffin will be lucky to hang on for another two years, just wait and see.

NotFinancialAdvice · Answer

Ken Griffin’s logic really doesn’t hold up. He profits from information asymmetry and still has the nerve to say DeFi is unfair? What a joke.

BlockDetective · Answer

Ken Griffin is really outrageous, profiting from information asymmetry while criticizing DeFi for being unfair.

---

Citadel’s logic is: we have a monopoly, so decentralization doesn’t work for you.

---

Here we go again, traditional finance wants to use regulation to strangle DeFi, but it won’t be that easy.

---

This is hilarious, institutions that make a living off HFT talking about fairness—this is honestly the biggest joke of the year.

---

Regulation will come sooner or later, but the key is who holds the knife. Adams really hit the nail on the head this time.

---

The Constitution DAO incident isn’t even over, and this guy is stirring things up again.

---

Developers being regulated like centralized platforms? That logic is just absurd.

---

Institutions that profit from speed advantages are now questioning open-source protocols—unbelievable.

---

Traditional market makers are panicking; that’s a good sign.

---

I really don’t get it, why do some people always want to force DeFi into the old framework?

RektButStillHere · Answer

Ken Griffin’s rhetoric is really something else. He profits off information asymmetry and still has the nerve to talk about fairness?

BearEatsAll · Answer

Haha, Griffin really can't keep a straight face anymore. Traditional market makers just can't stand to see DeFi making profits.

Why should open-source protocols listen to your instructions? Then you turn around and accuse them of being unfair, what a joke.

Now we're just waiting to see which side the SEC picks. I bet the bullet will backfire on them.

This is the usual operation of vested interests, one word: "cowardly."

They keep waving the regulatory stick, but developers have already moved to other chains.

What a mess, Citadel wants to monopolize liquidity? Keep dreaming.