2026-01-20 08:37:55

Recently, there have been a few good trading positions on the market. I took a closer look and found that there are actually some patterns to follow. Many opportunities can be truly captured; the key is to identify effective strong support zones and strong resistance zones. Pair this with properly set stop-losses and participate with low leverage, so the risk remains controllable.

From the current perspective, it’s not that complicated, but you need to see through the surface to understand the essence. The essence is simple: short at resistance, long at support. Even if the main players are involved in manipulation, their impact on the market’s fundamental nature is actually limited. This is the underlying logic of trading—grasp this, and trading will become much clearer.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

21 Likes

Reward
21
8
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

CryptoHistoryClass

· 01-23 08:31

lmao "support holds this time" — pretty sure we heard that exact line before $LUNA imploded. *checks historical charts* yeah, the pattern recognition here is giving major dot-com bubble energy ngl

Reply0

ShibaSunglasses

· 01-22 19:25

Low leverage really saves lives; many people get wiped out by high leverage. That's right, but very few can actually execute it. I've heard the support and resistance explanation too many times; the key is to seize the right moment. This logic sounds good, but in practice, it always feels a bit off. Low stop-loss, high returns—sounds easy, but it hurts to actually do it. Are the pressure levels more often empty, and support levels more often held? Sometimes it feels the other way around. The phrase "risk is controllable" sounds easy, but only when you're truly亏; that's when you realize what risk really means.

View OriginalReply0

MEVHunterZhang

· 01-21 12:21

Honestly, low leverage is indeed stable, but I'm just worried I can't hold it together. I agree with the logic of supporting more with less pressure; the main force can't change the overall trend. This wave of market movement is indeed traceable; the key is self-discipline. Every time I see this kind of analysis, I think of the lessons from previous liquidations... low leverage is really advantageous. Once the underlying logic is clear, execution is the real challenge.

View OriginalReply0

MetaverseVagabond

· 01-20 09:08

Low leverage is really no problem; it's just that people with poor execution always can't do it. That's right, supporting and resisting levels are indeed the easiest to overlook. Main force manipulation? Uh, sometimes I feel their influence is overestimated. Set your stop-loss properly, and your mindset will be stable. I agree with this. It's always said to be simple, but when it comes to actual operation, it starts to get messy again.

View OriginalReply0

SchroedingerGas

· 01-20 08:58

Low leverage is truly the way to go; I've seen too many people get wiped out in a single shot and face liquidation. Support and resistance levels are indeed useful, but the key is whether you can follow through with execution. Knowing what to do is easy, doing it is hard. Is the influence of the main players limited? That’s a bit bold, but as long as your thinking is clear, you can make money. The current market is like this; catching the strong support rebound is the main task. That's right, setting stop-losses properly stabilizes your mindset. This is the way to survive.

View OriginalReply0

ruggedNotShrugged

· 01-20 08:53

Low leverage indeed feels comfortable, but is the support level really that stable? Is the pressure and support mostly just post-hoc analysis? Feels like armchair strategizing, bro. Here comes the routine again—why can't real trading just set stop-losses properly? Using low leverage is correct, but everyone understands this logic; the hard part is execution. Limited influence of the main players? That sounds a bit... hard to believe. Setting proper stop-losses is indeed crucial, but actually risking money is a different story. Look beyond the surface to see the essence; the key is that you need to stay alive to understand the underlying logic. After playing with support and resistance for so long, why do I still keep getting swept out?

View OriginalReply0

SchrodingersFOMO

· 01-20 08:52

That's quite right, the key is to stick to discipline. Many people are always reluctant to cut losses. Low leverage is the right way; don't mess around with high leverage tricks. The support and resistance levels are indeed useful, but I'm worried that if too many people use them, they might become ineffective. It's easier said than done; only a few can truly stick to it. Currently, the market's main players' trading space is indeed limited, and that's correct. When support levels are abundant, it's a good time to position; this timing judgment is the hardest. I think the biggest pitfall in trading is greed. Even when the plan is set, people always want to earn a bit more. There are strategies, but it depends on who uses them. Garbage techniques can also make money in the hands of experts. When the resistance level can't be broken, don't force it. That's a lesson learned from experience. It's really about risk management, which is much more important than how long you watch the charts.

View OriginalReply0

ClassicDumpster

· 01-20 08:41

That's right, that's the point. Too many people are greedy and still think about high leverage, resulting in losing everything in one wave. The support and resistance set really works; the key is to have patience and wait. I've been thinking about this recently, and I feel that low leverage is the secret to lasting longer. The main players control the trading, but the underlying logic of the market is right there. Once you see through it, you won't be scared. Setting stop-losses properly can really save your life. Don't ask me how I know.

View OriginalReply0