2026-01-02 09:26:35

I originally just wanted to do a cautious contract trading, but I didn't expect a certain top exchange to directly hook me with this gameplay.

Simply put: trading generates fees → exchanged for platform tokens as cashback → these tokens automatically enter the new project launch pool → finally, all participants share 640,000 $MON.

What does this mean? The fees are essentially "recouped," and you can also conveniently get a potential airdrop while trading. This design is indeed quite interesting.

MON is the native token of the Monad chain. Monad itself adopts a high-performance L1 approach, with the core selling point being a parallel execution architecture combined with EVM compatibility, focusing heavily on speed and scalability. All kinds of data indicators look quite solid.

MON-0.06%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

15 Likes

Reward
15
4
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

ColdWalletGuardian

· 01-02 09:54

Fees can be recovered, and you can also conveniently farm airdrops—this trading platform really knows how to play. I have to try this out; anyway, trading is something I already do, so why not earn a little more? The parallel execution of MON sounds promising, but it only counts if it can actually run smoothly. Wait, could this launch pool be just another new trick to cut the leeks? Contract trading combined with airdrop expectations definitely makes people excited. Sounds good, but I'm just worried that the final step might lead to a dump. This cashback design, if it weren’t for the airdrop attraction, who would pay attention to it? 64 million MON sounds like a lot; how many can each person get? A bit tempted, but I still need to stay cautious with my wallet.

View OriginalReply0

WhaleStalker

· 01-02 09:53

This routine is really amazing, the handling fee can be recovered and airdrops, the exchange brain... --- In terms of MON, Monad's parallel execution does have two hits, but whether it can really start depends on whether it can be used --- It's another routine of "automatically entering the pool", be careful not to become a receiver, buddy --- Fee return + airdrop, it sounds beautiful but you have to guard against when the exchange changes the rules --- The combination of parallel EVM is good, the question is whether the ecology can keep up, and there are a lot of air projects --- 640,000 $MON sounds like a lot, but there are few people who get it... So many people divide it --- Contract trading is inherently risky, and coupled with this cashback mechanism, it is properly inducing you to trade more --- Monad is fast, I believe it, but can it really replace Ethereum? Let's take a look at TVL first

View OriginalReply0

BugBountyHunter

· 01-02 09:50

Oh my, I almost fell for this scam. Can the handling fee be refunded? It made me laugh. This move is indeed brilliant. The platform is playing a big game. Wait, the 640,000 MON might not be worth much in the end. Airdrops and cashback again—are you really treating us as fools? That Monad parallel architecture sounds impressive, but how it actually works remains to be seen. I just want to ask, is this startup pool going to be cut again by big players? The profit comes from the users; your transaction fees are being exploited. This model has been outdated for a long time; why are you still playing with it? But on the other hand, if I could really get free airdrops... I might also start trading.

View OriginalReply0

PumpStrategist

· 01-02 09:39

A typical exchange trick: the moment they offer "cashback" on fees, they've already cut into you. Don't be fooled by the apparent break-even on the books; the chips have long been diluted into scraps. The step of automatically entering the startup pool is even more ruthless—it's like forcing participation in a no-liquidity airdrop gamble. The risk is deferred until the launch day, and by then, it'll be a mess. MON's parallel execution sounds impressive, but for projects that have already taken shape, latecomers are often just the bagholders. Market sentiment indicators have long shown this.

View OriginalReply0