🚀 Gate Square “Gate Fun Token Challenge” is Live!
Create tokens, engage, and earn — including trading fee rebates, graduation bonuses, and a $1,000 prize pool!
Join Now 👉 https://www.gate.com/campaigns/3145
💡 How to Participate:
1️⃣ Create Tokens: One-click token launch in [Square - Post]. Promote, grow your community, and earn rewards.
2️⃣ Engage: Post, like, comment, and share in token community to earn!
📦 Rewards Overview:
Creator Graduation Bonus: 50 GT
Trading Fee Rebate: The more trades, the more you earn
Token Creator Pool: Up to $50 USDT per user + $5 USDT for the first 50 launche
OpenAI's Safety Chief Exits: Is the Company Losing Control of AGI Development?
In a significant blow to OpenAI’s governance structure, Miles Brundage—the company’s top safety researcher and head of ‘AGI Readiness’—has departed as of October 23. This isn’t just a personnel change; it marks the complete dissolution of OpenAI’s dedicated safety oversight division.
What This Means
Brundage’s team was responsible for policy guidance and safety protocols as OpenAI races toward artificial general intelligence (AGI)—a theoretical AI capable of performing any human task. With the unit disbanded, OpenAI now operates without a formal safety department, even as it pushes toward more powerful models.
His exit follows a troubling pattern: the previous AGI oversight body, the ‘Superalignment’ team, was already dismantled after co-lead Jan Leike left in May, citing a “breaking point” over management disputes. Co-founder Ilya Sutskever followed in June and has since launched a $5 billion-valued competitor.
The Exodus Problem
Brundage’s departure isn’t happening in isolation. OpenAI has hemorrhaged senior talent:
What’s Next?
Brundage plans to launch or join a nonprofit focused on AI policy research—essentially abandoning the corporate safety infrastructure entirely. OpenAI declined to comment on what replaces the AGI Readiness team, suggesting no immediate successor is planned.
The Real Story
While OpenAI released a diplomatic statement thanking Brundage for his contributions, the subtext is clear: safety infrastructure is being deprioritized in favor of speed-to-market. Whether this accelerates innovation or creates systemic risk remains the defining question for the industry.