Recently, economist Anthony sharply criticized the monthly employment report from the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, sparking widespread follow. As a nominee for the director of the Bureau of Labor Statistics, Anthony pointed out that the report has serious flaws that could mislead decision-makers.



Anthony emphasized that there are fundamental issues with the basic methods, economic models, and statistical assumptions of the monthly employment report. He believes that this data is often exaggerated and is, in fact, unreliable. This inaccuracy can have far-reaching effects on decision-making across all parties, from businesses to governments.

Notably, Anthony made a bold suggestion: the monthly employment report should be suspended until the issues are resolved. He stated, 'How can companies make reasonable plans when they cannot accurately understand changes in the labor market? How should the Federal Reserve formulate appropriate monetary policy?'

As an alternative, Anthony suggested continuing to release quarterly data. Although this data is not as timely as monthly reports, he believes its accuracy is higher and is more suitable as a basis for decision-making.

Anthony's perspective has sparked people's thoughts on the quality of economic data. In the current complex economic environment, accurate data is crucial for formulating effective policies. Whether it's Wall Street investors or Washington policymakers, reliable data support is needed.

This controversy also highlights the importance of economic data collection and analysis methods. As the economic structure continues to change, traditional statistical methods may need to be adjusted accordingly. Finding a balance between timeliness and accuracy will be an important issue that economic statistics will face in the future.

Overall, Anthony's perspective provides us with an opportunity to re-examine the quality of economic data. Before relying on this data to make significant decisions, it is particularly important to ensure its reliability and accuracy.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 8
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
RektDetectivevip
· 1h ago
The statistics bureau was completely cut down with one blow.
View OriginalReply0
CoffeeNFTsvip
· 2h ago
Blockchain coffee connoisseur, encryption art trendy toy trading
View OriginalReply0
SlowLearnerWangvip
· 08-13 10:46
The employment report is also fabricated. Tsk tsk.
View OriginalReply0
ClassicDumpstervip
· 08-13 07:49
Another wave of suckers play people for suckers warning
View OriginalReply0
Layer3Dreamervip
· 08-13 07:42
theoretically speaking, employment data = centralized fud... need zk-proofs for verification tbh
Reply0
GhostInTheChainvip
· 08-13 07:42
This data is too fake.
View OriginalReply0
TeaTimeTradervip
· 08-13 07:37
The data is all altered; who can clearly distinguish between the real and the fake?
View OriginalReply0
RunWithRugsvip
· 08-13 07:33
If you dare to say anything is not exaggerated, then the real data looks even worse.
View OriginalReply0
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate app
Community
English
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)