The subsidy for this Pool of Ethena on Aave has dropped to 5%. If that's the case, this strategy completely fails the PT circular loan of a certain DEX.



This is equivalent to using 50% of the免赎回 to exchange for discounted returns, but in cases where the yields from the revolving loan are not high enough, some users may choose to sacrifice some returns in favor of a more conservative strategy.

I still maintain my original viewpoint. If the subsidy budget is an issue, the best choice is to limit the amount rather than reduce the returns.
ENA15.86%
AAVE5.55%
View Original
post-image
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 4
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
SeeYouInFourYearsvip
· 08-08 18:43
Why not directly set a limit?
View OriginalReply0
MerkleDreamervip
· 08-08 18:41
Here it comes, five points to break the big defense.
View OriginalReply0
SpeakWithHatOnvip
· 08-08 18:14
Saving money is not easy.
View OriginalReply0
LuckyBlindCatvip
· 08-08 18:13
Isn't the limit quota attractive?
View OriginalReply0
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate app
Community
English
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)