Recently, there was a move at the U.S. legislative level—the Senate passed a bipartisan resolution to limit authority over military actions against a certain country. At first glance, this seems far removed from the crypto sphere, but upon closer inspection, the impact is actually quite significant.

A brief interpretation: The space for aggressive U.S. policy has been compressed, which means geopolitical tensions may ease somewhat. For the crypto market, this gets interesting—on one hand, reduced geopolitical risk could weaken BTC's safe-haven demand, which in the short term may be a bearish signal; on the other hand, improved policy stability could create opportunities for related assets in politically sensitive regions, but this carries extremely high risks, so don't blindly follow the hype.

However, there are several points that must be noted. First, this restriction primarily constrains prior policies and has limited binding force on the current government. Second, the internal political landscape in relevant regions remains complex, and the actual circulation value of assets remains questionable. Finally—and most critically—sentiment shifts in the crypto market often move faster than the news itself, so don't let headlines lead you around by the nose. Policy is the backdrop; the market is the main actor.